Interestingly though 8-bit input was sufficient. Things like dot gain mean you need the extra precision. By processing I mean internal processing within a specific stage like multiple intensity processing. Greater than 8-bit processing is definitely required for optimal printing. ![]() Several years ago I did some investigations into 8 vs 16-bit printing at the various stages of the print pipeline. At least I hope it was a technical decision and not pure marketing. It is good to see someone doing that and even more impressively that Canon agreed it going into production. The XPS print model might have various advantages be it, high bit depth as they report for the driver, or something like better colour management tagging. I assume someone in Canon was creatively assessing the print models in Windows and seeing where improvements could be made. I have no specific experience with that particular driver and printer to share but in your position I would definitely try it. Other than the added bit depth, what features and capabilities do I gain - or lose - by moving to the XPS driver? What is the argument for using, or not using, the XPS driver? I've Googled around on this, but haven't found any info that I'd consider authoratative.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |